23 May 2025, NIICE Commentary 11031
Anurag Paul
Citizenship, once seen as a straightforward legal bond between the individual and the state, has evolved in response to modern challenges such as globalization, multiculturalism, and immigration. This transformation has complicated traditional understandings of national identity, civic participation, and belonging. The rise of multicultural policies, particularly in liberal democracies, has strained the relationship between the rights of immigrants and the entitlements of established citizens, giving rise to what can be termed as "reverse nationalism." The modern understanding of citizenship, therefore, must navigate the intricate balance between individual rights, national identity, and the principles of inclusivity. This essay explores the dynamic relationship between citizenship, human rights, and multiculturalism, examining how these concepts have evolved and interact in a contemporary globalized world.
Evolution of Citizenship and Human Rights
The modern concept of citizenship can be traced back to T.H. Marshall’s seminal work, which identified three essential dimensions of citizenship: civil, political, and economic rights. Marshall argued that as residents evolved into citizens, they developed a sense of shared ownership and reciprocal obligations with both the state and civil society. This framework, however, has been challenged by the demographic shifts and cultural diversities resulting from contemporary migration patterns. In an increasingly globalized world, traditional notions of citizenship are no longer sufficient to encompass the complexities posed by multiculturalism. The migration of people from different cultural, religious, and ethnic backgrounds into established nation-states complicates the concept of national identity and citizenship, particularly in the Global North.
Historically, human rights have formed the backbone of modern citizenship, serving as the universal entitlements granted to all individuals regardless of their origin. From the early modern thinkers such as Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke, who championed "natural rights" as inherent to human nature, the evolution of human rights has been a key pillar in the development of democratic citizenship. These ideas reached a pivotal moment after the horrors of World War II, when the international community sought to formalize human rights globally. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and subsequent international covenants enshrined the protection of these rights as universal principles, laying the foundation for a new era of international law.
Human rights are typically classified into three generations: civil and political rights (first generation), economic, social, and cultural rights (second generation), and solidarity rights (third generation). The first generation emphasizes negative freedoms—rights that protect individuals from governmental overreach, such as the right to life, liberty, and freedom of expression. Second-generation rights, which emerged in the 20th century, focus on economic and social entitlements such as education, healthcare, and social security. Finally, third-generation rights, which emerged after World War II, emphasize collective rights, including self-determination, environmental protection, and the right to peace. These categories, while distinct, are interdependent; political rights require economic security, and economic rights enable the exercise of political freedoms.
Multiculturalism and the Challenge to National Identity
In contemporary societies, multiculturalism has become an essential framework for accommodating diverse cultural, religious, and social identities. The accommodation of immigrants and their cultural and economic rights is a central tenet of multicultural policies, yet these policies often create tensions between the rights of immigrants and the entitlements of established citizens. The influx of immigrants into countries in the Global North has sparked fears among native citizens that their rights and resources are being undermined by the demands of newcomers. This tension is particularly evident in debates surrounding the allocation of state resources, as governments provide services such as healthcare, education, and welfare to meet the needs of immigrants, leading to perceptions of "reverse nationalism."
This concept of "reverse nationalism" refers to the erosion of national identity and citizenship sentiment among indigenous citizens who feel their rights are being diluted by the accommodation of immigrants. In societies where state resources are allocated to meet the needs of immigrants, there is often a perception that these resources are being drained from native-born citizens, creating a zero-sum dynamic where the gains of one group are perceived as inversely proportional to the losses of the other. The resulting fragmentation of national identity poses a significant challenge to the cohesion of multicultural societies.
Multicultural policies, though well-intentioned, sometimes clash with the foundational principles of nationalism. Nationalism, which ties citizens to a shared sense of history, culture, and values, becomes strained when the boundaries of the nation-state become less clear, and when the cultural and economic needs of immigrants are prioritized. This phenomenon is especially pronounced in liberal democracies where the balancing act between respecting individual rights and maintaining national cohesion becomes increasingly difficult.
Immigrant Rights vs. Citizen Entitlements
The tension between immigrant rights and citizen entitlements lies at the heart of the challenges faced by multicultural societies. As immigrants assert their cultural, economic, and social rights, they often find themselves in conflict with the perceived entitlements of established citizens. This conflict is particularly pronounced in terms of resource allocation. Governments must decide how to fairly distribute limited resources to meet the needs of both immigrants and the native population. The provision of social welfare, healthcare, education, and housing to immigrants is often seen by indigenous citizens as a direct threat to their own access to these resources. In many cases, the fulfillment of immigrant needs is perceived as a zero-sum game, where any gain by one group results in a loss for the other. This dynamic not only fuels resentment but also exacerbates the sense of alienation and disenfranchisement among native citizens. As a result, the political climate in multicultural societies has seen a rise in populist movements that emphasize nationalism and resist further integration of immigrants.
Moreover, the political realities of global governance complicate efforts to address these tensions. While human rights frameworks offer a universal vision of equality and dignity, the political and economic realities of immigration make it difficult to implement these principles consistently across borders. The role of international institutions such as the United Nations has been pivotal in promoting human rights, but the enforcement of these rights often falls short due to the competing interests of powerful states and the complex nature of immigration policy. This makes the full implementation of human rights in multicultural contexts an ongoing challenge.
Reconciliation of Rights and National Identity
Navigating the complex relationship between citizenship, multiculturalism, and human rights requires a nuanced understanding of how these concepts intersect. For multiculturalism to thrive without undermining national identity, it is essential to strike a balance that respects both the rights of immigrants and the entitlements of established citizens. This requires policies that ensure equitable distribution of resources while fostering a sense of shared belonging among all members of society. Multiculturalism must be framed within a human rights context, ensuring that both civil and social rights are upheld for all individuals, regardless of their background. As liberal democracies continue to grapple with the complexities of multiculturalism and immigration, it is crucial to develop policies that address the needs of both immigrants and indigenous citizens. The challenge lies in reconciling these competing demands in a way that fosters both individual dignity and national cohesion. The evolution of citizenship, from a simple legal bond to a complex framework of rights and obligations, must continue to adapt to the realities of an increasingly diverse and interconnected world.
Anurag Paul is a Research Intern at NIICE and is currently pursuing his Master od Arts in Political Science at Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.
Leave a Reply