BOOK REVIEWS
Modernising the People’s Liberation Army ultimately serves as a sober reminder of the unpredictable journey ahead for the PLA and its impact on international security.
Cheung’s analysis is compelling and rigorous, providing a nuanced understanding of China’s rise as a techno-security state by skillfully integrating historical context, policy analysis, and theoretical frameworks.
The identity piece of Fukuyama provides its readers with a chance to elaborate on the paramount role of identity in society and human nature as a whole.
This book covers the period of maintaining relations, the period of sliding relations, the intervened relations, the tilted relations, the role of diplomats and psychological barriers and others. In each chapter, the author has explained the topics with great detail which is of immense benefit to policymakers, researchers, journalists and diplomats.
A new foreign policy is more assertive and uncompromising toward China's neighbors, the United States, and the rest of the world has been heralded by Xi Jinping's rise to power.
This volume edited by Dr. Fatima Waqi Sajjad, Director of the Critical Peace Studies institute at the University of Management and Technology, Lahore – presents Liberation Psychology as a constitutive trope and remedy in order to position the Global South as victims of not only physical but also epistemic violence of colonial powers.
Anderson's exploration of vernacular languages' role in creating a national sense of community and the connection between nationalism and violence holds great relevance in today's world.
The book has unfolded some areas of research on Indo-Pacific strategics and has suggested that the Indo-Pacific will be the future area for great power politics.
The author has broadly tried to provide an understanding of how the hill people are treated by the lowlands and specifically used J.C. Scott’s term ‘illegible space’ to refer to the hills as non-state space.
The author of the book, Michael D. Cohen, argues that nuclear proliferation tends to be dangerous when leaders learn that nuclear assertion is safe, and proliferation tends to be safe when leaders learn that nuclear assertion is dangerous.