Defense and Security at its very core attempts to explore the liaison between politics and the several kinds of military power, from the use of terror by small, non-state groups to the susceptible use of nuclear weapons. The scholars of the respective center bring forward the blend of contemporary strategic and trenchant case studies transcending the conventional wisdom offering the recommendations that are ultra-practicable. Bringing in various multidisciplinary, critical, and regional expertise, the analysis presented won’t solely rely on straight-line predictions but rather will consider the full range of possibilities and anticipate a broad scope of plausible outcome. The analysis provided will not only be looking at the implications of the current issues but also will further aid to identify and analyze the issue thereafter. The Security and Strategy center tends to cover broad array of issues, majorly dealing with Nuclear Issues, Military Issues, Defense modernization, Terrorism and Militancy.
The Philippine Navy should also recognize the value of joint warfighting along the electromagnetic spectrum. Competition in multi-domain naval warfare requires interception of signals and who gets faster and better information requires complementary augmentation in traditional military strategies ...
One of the most pressing issues is how long can India maintain its relevance and balance its diplomacy when major powers such as the US are involved and all India can do is brace itself for all that the future beholds ...
Global Security Initiative seemed to be an extended version of Beijing’s earlier security initiatives that suits the current geopolitical situation and will not bring any drastic change to China’s policies toward international security ...
A conglomeration of like-minded countries is the need of an hour to propose policy alternatives to approach North Korea. A progressive approach towards peace and disarmament is much needed to curtail the North’s occupation ...
The increase in defence spending by Germany would achieve two objectives, first, it will contribute to European Security and second, it will reduce the burden on the United States, which would want to turn its focus on Indo-Pacific to counter increasingly assertive China ...
The Obama administration’s stunningly arrogant interference in Ukraine’s domestic political affairs in 2013 and 2014 to assist demonstrators in overthrowing Ukraine’s elected, pro-Russia president was the single most audacious provocation, and it heightened tensions ...
This war on Ukraine will be a testimony to the limits of military support superpowers can yield when it comes to war, and the underlying unfinished security issues of Europe and the security concerns of Russia have to be resolved collectively ...
The pro-active measure in early February to declassify documents pertaining to Russian intelligence by United States President Joseph Biden proved to be a decisive action that caught Putin off guard and impacted the Russian narrative of information warfare ...
The war in Ukraine has exposed the delicate security environment in the international system and has shown that countries are willing to break international norms to achieve their objectives ...
Conflict Diplomacy in a Turbulent World
Great powers and wealthy countries must challenge “us vs. them” rhetoric and not use the UN Security Council and forums like the G7 to only further their agenda ...